Bob June 25, at 7: The 2nd amendment states: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Reply Jacob Paulsen June 28, at
Oren Chervinsky February 1, at 1: As you are aware, a number of additional blogger sites picked up the story and continued with this important conversation, and I would like to thank you for bringing more light to this growing problem.
Your article was forwarded to me by a parent friend of mine in Washington D. I know from my own life, that he is not alone and many parents across the US, North America, and the World are struggling with these very questions.
The article struck a particular cord with me, and touches on a problem we are attempting to address at my work Otono Networkswhere we are launching the first fully integrated kid-lines. Rowan describes, and uses her approach of small incremental time allotments to introduce kids to wireless. So where does that leave us?
Looking for a technology solution that helps parents introduce children to the world of wireless technology, while protecting them from the variety of risks. Easy enough, you might say, there are a myriad of technology solutions that offer parental control apps, kids cell phones etc.
But what we have found is that these solutions become quite cost prohibitive for large swaths of the population once applied as intended especially if you look at the total cost of ownership — including the cost of airtime and parental data requirementsand most only offer monitoring type control or post hoc lists.
Very few offer prophylactic solutions that help parents keep children from trouble in the first place. This becomes a particularly interesting problem for me as both a concerned and engaged adult, but also as a Telecom executive, that has spent the better part of his career peddling cellular technologies.
In my defense, no one expected the path smartphones have taken, and certainly no one expected how quickly our youngest generations would adopt and master these technologies. In any event, my industry is now a prime player in the struggle to protect our children.
In her article, Ms. Rowan advocates limited time allowances for younger children being introduced to wireless devices. With that in mind, I am proud to report that Otono Networks f. Roam Mobility has actually taken this problem to heart. We believe that the best way to introduce kids to wireless technology is not by banning access.
We also recognize that supervised use is often impractical and can lead to kids feeling untrusted. For these reasons, we decided that parents needed to be able to activate and deactivate their kids phones in small increments remotely ideally from their device directly.
Once we understood that this feature was evolutionary and revolutionary in the cellular industry, we built an entire prepaid, non-contract service for families around it called Krew Mobile.
In and of itself, the best deal in prepaid wireless. Given the state of the economy both North and South of the borderwe recognized that you this is simply too important to try and price gauge customers.
To that end, we are committed to keeping Krew Mobile accessible to all budgets. However, we also that to be competitive we need to provide all the bells and whistles parents and kids need. So instead of just building in the standard features, we are asking parents to help us build the service from the ground up.
We have just launched a Krew Pilot Program, where parents can sign up to free or dramatically discounted service and are providing feedback on the product development roadmap.
We are partnering with organizations across the US to engage with parents and teachers, and collect as much feedback as possible. The pilot will stat in March, but sign ups have been overwhelming thus far.
I genuinely hope that you and your readers find this helpful. Happy to provide any more info. Please keep up the great work! Nikki December 4, at 1:Selena Ilean Palioda, motthall5 For the people that think that guns should be taken from civilians in total I believe that there are many ways to get a chance to live in a community where you are not scared for your life and have to try and protect yourself.
40 Reasons to Ban Guns. 40 Reasons To Ban Guns. Arguments Made By Liberal Lawmakers. 1.
Banning guns works, which is why New York, DC, Detroit & Chicago cops need guns. 2. Washington DC 's low murder rate of 69 per , is due to strict gun control, and Indianapolis ' high murder rate of 9 per , is due to the lack of gun control.
Maybe the best thing to do is to first determine if the individual in question has or had ill intentions with the weapons before we use the media to spread fear about extremist, right-wing pistol packers.
Ten Really Good Reasons to Ban Guns. This is way too high. All guns should be banned 3. Guns are unnecessary. In 98% of civilian gun defenses, no shot is fired.
If you are not going to fire a shot, you clearly don't need a gun. This proves that the guns are unnecessary.
Banning guns will prevent these unnecessary defenses. Why Guns Should not be Banned. Did you know you are 4 times more likely to be killed with a knife or other cutting instrument than you are by a rifle or a shotgun?Why Guns Should not be Banned.
Authored by Matt Agorist via The Free Thought Project. As the debate continues about whether or not 3D-printed firearm plans should be banned, even the ostensible pro-2nd Amendment folks are worried that shooting rampages will occur as a result of these plans being published heartoftexashop.com the reality is .