Those elements will include: To improve our thinking, we actually have to think for ourselves, to explore and make sense of thinking situations by using our thinking abilities. Although it is important to read about thinking and learn how other people think, there is no substitute for actually doing it ourselves.
Stubbornness and Taking a Stand Prejudice vs. Sympathies Summary Analysis The Judge gives the jury instructions from offstage, setting the scene as the lights come up. He or she lays out the stakes: He informs the jurors that they must find the defendant not guilty if there is a reasonable doubt that he is guilty.
The vote must be unanimous.
The Guard opens the window, surveys the room, and moves upstage to count the jurors as they enter. However, the window, the water cooler, and the opportunity to play tic-tac-toe later distract the jurors. Active Themes As the jurors enter, some go to the water cooler, Juror Five lights a pipe, and Juror Seven opens the window a bit wider, while still others stand and lean on their chairs.
These mundane activities establish the jurors first and foremost as human beings, capable of flaws and prejudices. Active Themes Juror Seven nervously offers gum to the men at the water cooler and makes idle chat. Juror Nine responds to Juror Seven with a polite no. Juror Twelve complains about the heat in the room, saying that his taxes are so high they ought to cover air conditioning.
The Guard locks the door behind him as he leaves, with all the jurors settled in their seats. Twelve is self-focused and used to privilege.
Seven is flighty, and only vaguely interested in the proceedings, which he hopes will end quickly. Nine is aloof, but polite. The Guard reminds the jurors and the audience of the presence of a world and legal structure beyond the jury room.
Juror Three bristles at the need for the door to be locked. Active Themes Juror Four, acting as a peacemaker, asks everyone to openly admit that the heat in the room has them short-tempered.
Juror Three, acting the contrarian, responds that he feels fine. The Foreman suggests in response that serving on a jury is their duty, while Juror Three jokes that Juror Four should give Juror Twelve a job, noting that Juror Four is probably rich because of his custom-tailored suit.
Throughout, Four is rational and levelheaded.LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in Twelve Angry Men, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.
Reflection of American Society Justice. Twelve Angry Men is a courtroom drama written by Reginald Rose concerning the jury of a homicide trial. It was broadcast initially as a television play in The following year it was adapted for the stage, and in was made into a highly successful film.
Since then it has been given numerous remakes, adaptations, and tributes. Analysis on Twelve Angry Men Words | 4 Pages. Analysis on Twelve Angry Men The movie Twelve Angry Men portrays an array of group dynamics by including the structure and functioning of groups, as well as the different types of roles each character plays along with their conflicts.
12 Angry Men Questions and Answers. The Question and Answer section for 12 Angry Men is a great resource to ask questions, find answers, and discuss the novel.
12 Angry Men Film Analysis 25 October Film Analysis The film, 12 Angry Men (), is a drama about a jury that was to decide the fate of a teenaged boy who was facing the electric chair for supposedly killing his father with a switchblade knife.
Introduction. The play and subsequent movie “Twelve Angry Men” is an examination of the dynamics at play in a jury room in the 50’s in The United States.